🔗 Share this article

Picture this: a smiling the Danish striker wearing Napoli's colors. Now, place it with a dejected the Slovenian forward sporting United's jersey, looking as if he just missed a sitter. Do not worry locating an actual photo of that miss; background information is the enemy. Now, include some goal stats in a big, silly font. Remember the emojis. Share it everywhere.

Would you point out that Højlund's goal count features strikes in the Champions League while his counterpart does not compete in continental tournaments? Of course not. Nor would you highlight that four of the Dane's goals were scored versus Belarus and Greece, or that his national team is far superior to Slovenia and generates many more chances. If you manage social media for a large outlet, raw engagement is your livelihood, Manchester United are the prime target, and nuance is the thing to avoid.

So the wheel of content spins. The next job is to scan a lengthy interview with the legendary goalkeeper and extract the part where he describes the acquisition of Sesko "weird". Just before, where he qualifies his comments by saying, "I have nothing bad to say about Benjamin Sesko"... yes, remove that part. No one wants that. Simply ensure "strange" and "Sesko" appear together in the headline. The audience will be outraged.

This Time of Promise and Premature Judgment

The heart of fall has traditionally one of my preferred periods to watch football. The leaves swirl, winds shift, squads and strategies are still fresh, everything is new and yet patterns are emerging. The stars of the season ahead are staking their claims. The summer market is closed. Nobody is mentioning the quadruple yet. All teams are still in the game. At this precise point, anything is possible.

However, for many of the same reasons, mid-autumn has long been one of my most disliked times to consume news on football. Because although no outcomes are decided, something must always be getting settled. Jack Grealish is resurgent. The German talent has been a major letdown. Could Semenyo be the top performer in the league at this moment? We need an answer immediately.

The Player as The Prime Example

And for numerous reasons, Benjamin Sesko feels like the archetype in this respect, a player caught between football's two countervailing, non-negotiable forces. The need to delay final conclusions, allowing layers of technical texture and strategic understanding to mature. And the imperative to generate permanent verdicts, a conveyor belt of opinions and jokes, out-of-context condemnations and pointless contrasts, a square that can never truly be solved.

It is not my aim to provide a in-depth evaluation of Sesko's time at United to date. The guy has started four times in the top flight in a highly unpredictable team, scored two goals, and had a grand total of 116 contacts with the ball. What exactly are we analysing? And do I propose to replicate the pundits' notable debate "Argument Over Benjamin Sesko", in which two famous analysts argue passionately on a popular show over whether Sesko needs 10 goals to be deemed successful this year (Neville), or whether it is more like 12 or 13 (Wright).

A Cruel Environment

For all this I loved watching him at Leipzig: a powerful, fast sports car of a forward, playing in a team pitched perfectly to his talents: given the license to attack but also the freedom to miss. And in part this is why Manchester United feels like the most unforgiving place he could possibly be right now: a place where "harsh judgments" are handed down in roughly the duration it takes to watch a short advertisement, the club with the widest and most ruthless gap between the time and air he requires, and the time and air he is likely to receive.

We saw a case of this during the national team pause, when a viral chart handily stated that Sesko had been deemed – by a wide margin – the worst signing of the recent market by a poll of 20 agents. And of course, the media are not the only ones in such behavior. Club channels, online personalities, anonymous X accounts with a suspiciously high number of fake followers: everybody with a vested interest is now essentially aligned along the same principles, an environment explicitly nosed towards provocation.

The Psychological Toll

Endless scrolling and tapping. What is happening to us? Are we aware, on some level, what this infinite sluice of irritation is doing to our minds? Quite apart from the essential weirdness of being a player in the center of it all, aware on some surreal chain-reaction level that every single thing about them is now basically content, commodity, public property to be packaged and traded.

And yes, partly this is because United are United, the corpse that keeps nourishing the cycle, a big club that must always be producing the strong emotions. But also, in part this is a temporary malaise, a pendulum of opinion most visibly and cruelly glimpsed at this season, about a month after the transfer market shut. Throughout the summer we have been desiring players, praising them, salivating over them. Now, only a handful of games later, a lot of those very players are already being disdained as broken goods. Is it time to worry about Jamie Gittens? Did Arsenal actually need their striker wise? What was the purpose of another expensive buy?

A Wider Issue

It seems fitting that Sesko faces their rivals on Sunday: a team simultaneously on a long unbeaten run at their stadium in the league and yet in their own state of feverish crisis, like submitting a missing person’s report on someone who popped to the store 30 minutes ago. Too open. Their star finished. The striker waste of money. The coach losing his hair.

Perhaps we have not yet quite grasped the way the storyline of football has started to replace football itself, to influence the way we watch it, an entire sport reoriented around discussion topics and immediate responses, something that occurs in the background while we scroll through our devices, unable to detach from the saline drip of opinions and further hot takes. It may be Sesko bearing the brunt right now. But in a way, we're all losing something here.