🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered favorable results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where the same content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."